CRAN_Status_Badge CRAN_Downloads_Badge

Overview

MatchIt provides a simple and straightforward interface to various methods of matching for covariate balance in observational studies. Matching is one way to reduce confounding and model dependence when estimating treatment effects. Several matching methods are available, including nearest neighbor matching, optimal pair matching, optimal full matching, genetic matching, exact matching, coarsened exact matching, and subclassification, some of which rely on functions from other R packages. A variety of methods to estimate propensity scores for propensity score matching are included. Below is an example of the use of MatchIt to perform full matching and assess balance:

library("MatchIt")
data("lalonde", package = "MatchIt")

#Full matching on the propensity score
m.out <- matchit(treat ~ age + educ + race + married + nodegree + re74 + re75, 
                 data = lalonde, method = "full")

Printing the MatchIt object provides details of the kind of matching performed.

m.out
#> A matchit object
#>  - method: Optimal full matching
#>  - distance: Propensity score
#>              - estimated with logistic regression
#>  - number of obs.: 614 (original), 614 (matched)
#>  - target estimand: ATT
#>  - covariates: age, educ, race, married, nodegree, re74, re75

We can check covariate balance for the original and matched samples using summary():

#Checking balance before and after matching:
summary(m.out)
#> 
#> Call:
#> matchit(formula = treat ~ age + educ + race + married + nodegree + 
#>     re74 + re75, data = lalonde, method = "full")
#> 
#> Summary of Balance for All Data:
#>            Means Treated Means Control Std. Mean Diff. Var. Ratio eCDF Mean eCDF Max
#> distance          0.5774        0.1822          1.7941     0.9211    0.3774   0.6444
#> age              25.8162       28.0303         -0.3094     0.4400    0.0813   0.1577
#> educ             10.3459       10.2354          0.0550     0.4959    0.0347   0.1114
#> raceblack         0.8432        0.2028          1.7615          .    0.6404   0.6404
#> racehispan        0.0595        0.1422         -0.3498          .    0.0827   0.0827
#> racewhite         0.0973        0.6550         -1.8819          .    0.5577   0.5577
#> married           0.1892        0.5128         -0.8263          .    0.3236   0.3236
#> nodegree          0.7081        0.5967          0.2450          .    0.1114   0.1114
#> re74           2095.5737     5619.2365         -0.7211     0.5181    0.2248   0.4470
#> re75           1532.0553     2466.4844         -0.2903     0.9563    0.1342   0.2876
#> 
#> 
#> Summary of Balance for Matched Data:
#>            Means Treated Means Control Std. Mean Diff. Var. Ratio eCDF Mean eCDF Max Std. Pair Dist.
#> distance          0.5774        0.5761          0.0060     0.9918    0.0039   0.0486          0.0192
#> age              25.8162       24.6928          0.1570     0.4853    0.0838   0.3220          1.2606
#> educ             10.3459       10.3227          0.0116     0.5577    0.0235   0.0620          1.2200
#> raceblack         0.8432        0.8347          0.0236          .    0.0086   0.0086          0.0378
#> racehispan        0.0595        0.0583          0.0049          .    0.0012   0.0012          0.5638
#> racewhite         0.0973        0.1071         -0.0329          .    0.0098   0.0098          0.4168
#> married           0.1892        0.1285          0.1549          .    0.0607   0.0607          0.4806
#> nodegree          0.7081        0.7040          0.0090          .    0.0041   0.0041          0.9143
#> re74           2095.5737     2199.7126         -0.0213     1.2008    0.0383   0.2350          0.8668
#> re75           1532.0553     1524.8362          0.0022     2.0048    0.0651   0.2308          0.7932
#> 
#> Percent Balance Improvement:
#>            Std. Mean Diff. Var. Ratio eCDF Mean eCDF Max
#> distance              99.7       90.0      99.0     92.5
#> age                   49.3       11.9      -3.0   -104.2
#> educ                  78.9       16.8      32.4     44.3
#> raceblack             98.7          .      98.7     98.7
#> racehispan            98.6          .      98.6     98.6
#> racewhite             98.2          .      98.2     98.2
#> married               81.2          .      81.2     81.2
#> nodegree              96.3          .      96.3     96.3
#> re74                  97.0       72.2      83.0     47.4
#> re75                  99.2    -1456.4      51.5     19.8
#> 
#> Sample Sizes:
#>               Control Treated
#> All            429.       185
#> Matched (ESS)   53.33     185
#> Matched        429.       185
#> Unmatched        0.         0
#> Discarded        0.         0

At the top is balance for the original sample. Below that is balance in the matched sample, followed by the percent reduction in imbalance and the sample sizes before and after matching. Smaller values for the balance statistics indicate better balance. We can plot the standardized mean differences in a Love plot for a clean, visual display of balance across the sample:

#Plot balance
plot(summary(m.out))

Although much has been written about matching theory, most of the theory relied upon in MatchIt is described well in Ho, Imai, King, and Stuart (2007) and Stuart (2010). The Journal of Statistical Software article for MatchIt can be accessed here, though note that some options have changed, so the MatchIt reference pages and included vignettes should be used for understanding the functions and methods available. Further references for individual methods are present in their respective help pages. The MatchIt website provides access to vignettes and documentation files.

Citing MatchIt

Please cite MatchIt when using it for analysis presented in publications, which you can do by citing the Journal of Statistical Software article below:

Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8). doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08

This citation can also be accessed using citation("MatchIt") in R. For reproducibility purposes, it is also important to include the version number for the version used.